Due to a miscommunication pertaining to the shortage
on the newly organized groups checks, we have asked
Oncors HR to
send us something explaining the reasoning of this.
Attached below is the letter they sent us. If you have
any further questions
please contact your business mgr. or steward.
Thanks
From:
Trimble, Ashleigh
Sent:
Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:35 PM
To:
Makarwich, Monty
Subject:
72 hour paycheck
Under the semi-monthly payroll reporting schedule,
there are two payroll periods each month
(1)
26th – 10th with
a pay date of 15th and
(2)
11th – 25th with
a pay date of the last day of the month.
Semi-monthly employees
paid for 1/11 – 1/25 on 1/31.
paid for 1/26 – 2/10 on 2/15.
*paid for 2/11 – 2/25 on 2/29.
Those still on this will be paid for 2/26 – 2/10 on
3/31.
For employees on the bi-weekly payroll reporting
schedule, they are paid every other Friday.
paid for 1/14 – 1/27 on 02/01
paid for 1/28 – 2/10 on 02/15
paid for 2/11 – 2/24 on 2/29
*paid for 2/25 – 3/9 on 3/14
The next check is 3/10 – 3/24 on 3/28
*I
put asterisks by the overlapping pay periods above.
So when you look at this on a calendar, employee who
received a semi-monthly check on 2/29 were paid
already for the work they did on 2/25. So when we
switched them to the bi-weekly pay period that
begins with 2/25, we did not want to pay them for
that day. So they started on biweekly at 2/26, for
a total of 9 full work days in that pay period – 72
hours.
Let me know if this still does not make sense and I
will try again.
March
26,2008
Just recieved
word tonight that our new Business mgr. Johnny
Flowers is going in tomorrow for heart by-pass
surgery.
Please keep him in your prayers!
We will keep
you updated on this matter.
March
27,2008
We got news
that Business Mgr. Johnny Flowers had a successful
heart procedure and doing well.
He will be
resting for a couple of weeks until he can get back
on his feet.
If you need
and business needs or matters, please contact Bobby
Reed. Thanks
April
11,2008
Well our
Business Mgr. came home from the hospital Thursday
and is on his way to recovery. He said he is doing
better and
thanks everyone for their prayers and calls.
April
14,2008
International
Labor Organization Finds
National Labor
Relations Board Definition of Supervisors
Violates Freedom
of Association Principles Decision
******************************************************
The AFL-CIO reports
that the International Labor Organization (ILO) has
declared that a recent National Labor Relations
Board (NLRB) decision that workers can be considered
“supervisors” (and denied union rights) if they
spend a small portion of their work time per day
exercising authority over other workers, violates
international labor principles.
The ILO is a United
Nations agency dedicated to strengthening the rights
of workers worldwide. It’s decisions are made on a
tripartite basis among government, employer and
worker representatives. Since it’s creation more
than 50 years ago, the Committee on Freedom of
Association (a branch of the ILO) has examined over
2,300 cases involving violations of internationally
accepted workers’ right.
The ILO released its
decision in March holding that the NLRB’s recent
interpretation of the term “supervisor” appears to
give rise to an overly wide definition of
supervisory staff that would go beyond freedom of
association principles by excluding such workers
from the protections of the National Labor Relations
Act (NLRA). The ILO issued its decision in response
to the AFL-CIO’s complaint that the NLRB’s decisions
in the Oakwood Trilogy violate principles of freedom
of association that bind the
United States by virtue of its
membership in the ILO.
AFL-CIO President
John Sweeney welcomed the decision. “The
Bush-dominated NLRB has taken every opportunity to
arm U.S. employers with the tools to defeat the
attempt of workers to gain a voice at work. The
ILO’s decision in this case vindicates workers’
rights of freedom of association and collective
bargaining, despite attempts at spinning it by U.S.
employers. We will continue to expose shameful
conduct of the U.S. government in every forum
available to us as we seek to strengthen the ability
to form and join unions.”